Which interpretation do you think the balance of evidence best supports? (details within)?

Neither explanation to me is plausible because not all males with hemophilia have mothers who are carriers. Sometimes a mutation occurs within the male himself resulting in hemophilia. Currently, it is not known why this mutation happens. The basic rule is: people see what they want to see and believe what they want to believe. The undying desire to see giants falling or angels dirtying their wings has always existed in man. A true scientific man is not easily bound by speculations. When it comes philosophy, indeed anything can happen but logic should ure a more or less balanced perspective.